Reform Press Release (13.5.03)
REFORM LEADERS CAN NO LONGER COMMEND NATIONAL EVANGELICAL ANGLICAN CONGRESS
Following the announcement that Dr. Rowan Williams has been invited to attend
the forthcoming Fourth National Evangelical Anglican Congress (NEAC 4), the
Trustees and Steering Committee of REFORM met in London to consider the implications.
The meeting was held because the REFORM Council had previously stated that,
whilst Dr. Williams standing as Archbishop of Canterbury would be respected,
members believed it right to distance themselves from his spiritual authority.
Following the meeting, the following statement was issued.
'The Trustees and Steering Committee of REFORM are greatly concerned over
serious theological differences with Dr Rowan Williams, especially over the
acceptability of active homosexual relationships. We note:
1. That, while now agreeing to abide by current Anglican discipline, he personally
does not agree with the mind of the overwhelming majority in the Anglican
Communion (Letter to the Primates, 23rd July 2002) on this issue, and
2. That he acknowledges my personal views are on record and I have not
found reason to change them and, then, is convinced that they
should not be a defining issue (Letter to Reform, 23rd September 2002).
The REFORM Trustees and Steering Committee, however, believe this is a defining
issue (cf 1 Corinthians 6:9-11; Revelation 2:20ff) and reflects serious theological
error. We deplore the pressure that has led the Church of England Evangelical
Council to invite Dr Rowan Williams to NEAC 4.
In the light of the invitation to Dr Williams, many will now feel unable to
attend the Congress and it is with the deepest regret that we, the Trustees
and Steering Committee of REFORM can no longer commend NEAC 4.'
NOTES FOR EDITORS
Dr Rowan Williams has been invited to NEAC 4 to bring a greeting and
lead in prayer, though not, we note, to teach.
We continue to respect Dr Williams unfailing courtesy in interview and
debate. However, we have deep reservations about Dr Williams views on:
-
The acceptability of same-sex relations. We acknowledge that Dr Williams has said he will abide by the mind and discipline of the Church on this subject, but cannot ignore the fact that he remains personally committed to what we see as an unbiblical position. (1)
- Salvation and Christology. Evangelicals continue strongly to affirm that human sin offends the holiness of God. The fact that Gods offended holiness needs to be satisfied is a core part of atonement, yet in his writing, (2) Dr Williams appears to want to relegate such views to the past.(3) Similarly, since Dr Williams relates sin to victimisation, he concludes that forgiveness is not the obliteration of the past. Yet one of the great joys of our salvation is that Christs atoning work on the cross gives us new birth.
- The authority of the Bible. Dr Williams stated methodology and commitment is to the mind of the Church, rather than, as the Churchs Articles require, to Gods Word written. This introduces a subjectivism into the issue of Biblical authority that is not historically Anglican and certainly neither evangelical nor Biblical. (4)
REFORM has hitherto supported the developing agenda at NEAC 4 and encouraged
others to do so on the grounds that it is seeking to reaffirm the classic
tenets of mainstream evangelicalism notably, the uniqueness of Christ,
the supreme authority and infallibility of the Bible, and the centrality of
Christs substitutionary death, all issuing in the priority of mission.
However, by inviting Dr Williams, this central aim of bringing greater clarity
to evangelicalism has been deeply compromised. It will mislead people about
what evangelicals believe.
We are saddened by the invitation because it was:
(a) unnecessary, since the Archbishop of York (in whose province the Congress
will meet) had already been invited;
(b) divisive, because of the recent and known sensitivities over the Archbishops
appointment; and
(c) solely the result of pressure exerted on the organising committee of NEAC
4 from a number of senior figures in the wider evangelical constituency who
had played little role in recent years in the Church of England Evangelical
Council (CEEC) the body with the constitutional right and responsibility
to call and organise NEAC.
Later this summer, REFORM is organising three Day Conferences to address what
we again and again believe to be the foundational issue authority in
the Church. The three days (in three different regions: Sat June 7, Bristol;
Fri June 13, Oldham; Fri July 4, NE London) will explore what is meant by
the authority of the Bible and how (to quote Lambeth 1988 and given expression
at Lambeth 1998 in section 1.10) the Bible is the controlling authority
in the Church. We contend that it is not Anglican, let alone evangelical
or Biblical, to say of core doctrinal and moral issues that we all accept
the authority of the Bible and only differ on interpretation. Our Anglican
Articles proscribe such inconsistency and imprecision (see Articles VI, VII,
XX, XXI, etc.). However, todays culture inside and outside the Church
requires us to restate where ultimate authority is to be found. Our Day Conferences
will address these questions and encourage members in our strategy and priority
of mission and evangelism.
Details of the Conferences and further information about REFORM behind this
statement, contact the REFORM Office: PO Box 1183, Sheffield S10 3YA.
REFORM is a network of Anglican evangelicals committed to evangelising the
nation. There is a common belief that the Church of England could provide
the best basis for this, but only if the Church remains committed to the absolute
authority of Scripture. REFORM was set up in the wake of the vote on the ordination
of women but now campaigns on a wide variety of issues. Approximately one
third of all members are clergy.
Footnotes
1 The latest magnum opus on the subject is The Bible & Homosexual
Practice: Texts and Hermeneutics (Robert Gagnon, 20002, Abingdon Press)
described by conservatives and revisionists alike as indispensable and definitive.
It concludes the Bible prohibits active homosexual relationships. Those who
disagree simply understand the place of the Bible differently and that
is the big issue.
2 Dr Williams dislike for this view of the atonement can be seen
in this quotation: Hence the awful language beloved even of some of
the finest theologians and preachers of an earlier age about Gods offended
holiness that needs to be mollified (Page 222, Open To Judgement)
3 See page 58, Open to Judgement
4 This is movingly and cogently explained in Dr. Jim Packers
article Why I walked (i.e. out of the Diocesan Synod in New Westminster,
Canada, which had just approved the blessing of same sex unions), printed
in Christianity Today Jan 2003 & published as No to same-sex unions
by Fellowship of Word & Spirit.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
Contact:
Rev David Banting (Chairman) on 01708 376 400
Rev Rod Thomas (Press Officer) on 01752 402 771